Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:52
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Who was the most ignorant American you have ever met?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
The solar system's greatest mystery may finally be solved - Phys.org
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why have Indian girls almost stopped wearing sarees?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill - CNN
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Is modular building a fix for NY's housing crisis? State officials hope so. - Gothamist
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Switzerland proposes forcing UBS to add $26bn in capital - Financial Times